Angels sign Albert Pujols Discuss Major League Baseball scores, news, and team information. Want to know the latest trade rumors? Follow your favorite NL or AL teams and players to the Pennant and through
the World Series.
-
All Universe

Originally Posted by
formerkywrestler
It's pretty early to be hitting the bottle.

That's exactly what I was thinking.
-
All Universe

Originally Posted by
HammerTime
His BA, OBP, and OPS have dropped every year for the last 4 years.
His RBI total has dropped every year for the past 3 years.
His Runs have dropped every year for the past 3 years.
He also has had some injury issues the past few years and that will only get worse. In the long run I'm glad the Cards didn't get locked into a long term deal here. I hate to see Albert not in a Cards uni any longer but it's definitley for the best. Now the Cards have a lot of offense to make up for.
-
All BluegrassPreps.com
The last ten year contact handed out looks like this...
08:$27M, 09:$32M, 10:$32M, 11:$31M, 12:$29M, 13:$28M, 14:$25M, 15:$21M, 16:$20M, 17:$20M
6 more years of A-Rod who has been hurt a lot lately and not producing. It might sting now Cards fans but you are likely better off without Sir Albert and that crazy contract.
Albert will make just over 68K per day for the nest 10 years.
Last edited by HammerTime; Dec 8, 11 at 11:01 AM.
-
All World
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
-
Moderator

Originally Posted by
Mustang
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
What was Pujols did that was so bad? Took the most money he could get?
-
All BluegrassPreps.com

Originally Posted by
Mustang
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
Everyone does it.
You show me a professional athlete who doesn't play for the money, and I'll show you a flat out liar. It's a job to these guys, not an extracirricular.
-
All BluegrassPreps.com
AdamSchefter
Angels owner Artie Moreno paid Albert Pujols $254 million -- $72 more million than he bought his team for in 2003.
Contracts in baseball aren't getting out of control or anything.
-
All World
He owes nothing to the Cardinals or anyone else. Get paid.
No one complains about the hundreds of player cuts that an organization makes each season to save money but wants to complain when the top players in the league get a huge salary. Makes no sense.
-
Moderator

Originally Posted by
Crash Davis
He owes nothing to the Cardinals or anyone else. Get paid.
No one complains about the hundreds of player cuts that an organization makes each season to save money but wants to complain when the top players in the league get a huge salary. Makes no sense.
Exactly. I think the AL was a good move for him.
-
All World

Originally Posted by
spindoc
Exactly. I think the AL was a good move for him.
Considering he may actually be 50 at the end of the 10 years.
-
All Universe

Originally Posted by
Mustang
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
As I said in the other thread, with the difference being somewhere between $30-50M, no one is going to pass that up. That is way too much money to take a pass on.
-
All District
A tweet I just read said that the Angel's owner paid $75 million dollars more to Pujols than what he bought the team for in 2003.
-
All BluegrassPreps.com

Originally Posted by
Mustang
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
I don't really feel like that is a fair statement at all. Why should he have any commitment to the Cardinals other than when he's under contract with them. 50 million more to go elswhere is hard not to turn down.
-
All BluegrassPreps.com

Originally Posted by
chickenhawk
A tweet I just read said that the Angel's owner paid $75 million dollars more to Pujols than what he bought the team for in 2003.
You know, that sounds like something Adam Schefter would probably tweet about.
-
All World

Originally Posted by
HammerTime
The last ten year contact handed out looks like this...
08:$27M, 09:$32M, 10:$32M, 11:$31M, 12:$29M, 13:$28M, 14:$25M, 15:$21M, 16:$20M, 17:$20M
6 more years of A-Rod who has been hurt a lot lately and not producing. It might sting now Cards fans but you are likely better off without Sir Albert and that crazy contract.
Albert will make just over 68K per day for the nest 10 years.
$68K...which is roughly $21K more than the average YEARLY income for a California household with a single earner.
-
All Universe

Originally Posted by
formerkywrestler
It's pretty early to be hitting the bottle.

I wish...haha
Stupid typing on my phone...
-
All Universe

Originally Posted by
Mustang
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
Actually the Marlins reportedly offered him $275 million over 10 years.
He took a lower contract to play in the AL (probably what he wanted to end his career in) and to play for a contending team.
-

Originally Posted by
Capernicus41
Pujols was the foundation. So many question marks now. At least they have some money to play with but I doubt they go after Prince and outside of him there really isn't much out there.
The Cardinals already had question marks in shortstop and center field. Now they have some wiggle room to address them.
-

Originally Posted by
Mustang
So it turns out that at the end of the day Pujols is nothing but a sell out like the rest of the professional sports fraternity who will sell themselves out to the highest bidder. Sad
Sad? So your saying you would not take a job that you would make a lot more money at, while doing the exact same job but actually might be a little easier since he can now DH some? Not to mention going to a better location for the job. I mean as long as the rest of the family was fine with it, then what person would not take it? We have to remember that even though it is a sport and fun for us to watch. It is also a business for them, and he did what many people would do if a similar situation happened in the jobs that we do.
-

Originally Posted by
bugatti
What was Pujols did that was so bad? Took the most money he could get?

Originally Posted by
Crash Davis
He owes nothing to the Cardinals or anyone else. Get paid.
No one complains about the hundreds of player cuts that an organization makes each season to save money but wants to complain when the top players in the league get a huge salary. Makes no sense.

Originally Posted by
Voice of Reason
As I said in the other thread, with the difference being somewhere between $30-50M, no one is going to pass that up. That is way too much money to take a pass on.
But when you profess your love for St. Louis and their fans and claim you want to be "a Cardinal for life" ...
First Team All-NBA
Today, 01:08 PM in National Basketball Association (NBA)