Trump and Putin meeting

Page 2 of The narrative on how this meeting went seems to be jumbled. Trump downplays who actually hacked our election in his speech and tweets prior to the G20.... 70 comments | 2069 Views | Go to page 1 →

  1. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 15
    Posts
    1,935

    This is hysterical :

    "Description
    The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a
    U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29,
    entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in
    spring 2016. "

    So some hostile actor hacked DNC servers? Yet, the DNC refuses to allow their servers to be examined by the FBI and Special Investigator Mueller has not subpoenaed access to these servers. Remember the lax security practices HRC was employing? She invited the intrusion by her own, and the DNC callous regard for security of their campaign information. The whole DNC campaign was rife with corruption and it was exposed as having corruption as a core tenant of its culture.

    DNC security was so lax, I could have obtained the same information that was exposed by wikileaks.
    Advertisement

  2. #17
    TheDeuce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 04
    Location
    The Heisman House
    Posts
    45,762

    Quote Originally Posted by mcpapa View Post
    Apparently, the new definition of awhile is four minutes.

  3. #18
    Hellcats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14
    Posts
    5,203

    Quote Originally Posted by Pioneer.Pride View Post
    This is hysterical :

    "Description
    The U.S. Government confirms that two different RIS actors participated in the intrusion into a
    U.S. political party. The first actor group, known as Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) 29,
    entered into the party’s systems in summer 2015, while the second, known as APT28, entered in
    spring 2016. "

    So some hostile actor hacked DNC servers? Yet, the DNC refuses to allow their servers to be examined by the FBI and Special Investigator Mueller has not subpoenaed access to these servers. Remember the lax security practices HRC was employing? She invited the intrusion by her own, and the DNC callous regard for security of their campaign information. The whole DNC campaign was rife with corruption and it was exposed as having corruption as a core tenant of its culture.

    DNC security was so lax, I could have obtained the same information that was exposed by wikileaks.
    So you agree it happened?


  4. #19
    mountain ref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 11
    Location
    mnts
    Posts
    13,586

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    I imagine there will be more when Mueller is done.
    I'm sure the unbiased all liberal and former Clinton and Obama workers will be sure to.

  5. #20
    mountain ref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 11
    Location
    mnts
    Posts
    13,586

    I'm waiting on proof of how Russia made people vote for Trump.

    If any collusion was involved, it was with Bill Clinton and The Attorney General to keep Hillary out of jail.

  6. #21
    capt278's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 08
    Posts
    4,294

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    I imagine there will be more when Mueller is done.
    You are salivating at the prospect.

    It will be laughable when Mueller finds nothing and the Dems are grasping at more straws.

  7. #22
    Hellcats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14
    Posts
    5,203

    Quote Originally Posted by mountain ref View Post
    I'm waiting on proof of how Russia made people vote for Trump.

    If any collusion was involved, it was with Bill Clinton and The Attorney General to keep Hillary out of jail.
    One small example is the tons of threads and posts made on here about Wikileaks wouldn't have existed without Russian meddling.

  8. #23
    mountain ref's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 11
    Location
    mnts
    Posts
    13,586

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    One small example is the tons of threads and posts made on here about Wikileaks wouldn't have existed without Russian meddling.
    Nothing from Wikileaks made me not vote for Hillary.

    Her rude behavior, snobby nose, her crooked Clinton Foundation, better than thou attitude, and her rich arrogance and hollier than holy attitude.
    That's why no one voted for her.
    Not the Russians.

  9. #24
    TheDeuce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 04
    Location
    The Heisman House
    Posts
    45,762

    Quote Originally Posted by mountain ref View Post
    Nothing from Wikileaks made me not vote for Hillary.

    Her rude behavior, snobby nose, her crooked Clinton Foundation, better than thou attitude, and her rich arrogance and hollier than holy attitude.
    That's why no one voted for her.
    Not the Russians.
    Replace "Clinton Foundation" with "Trump University" and you have perfectly described the President.

  10. #25
    mcpapa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 05
    Location
    Home of a proud papa
    Posts
    57,458

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDeuce View Post
    Replace "Clinton Foundation" with "Trump University" and you have perfectly described the President.
    We didn't exactly have the most palatable of major-party candidates last time around, did we?

  11. #26
    TheDeuce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 04
    Location
    The Heisman House
    Posts
    45,762

    Quote Originally Posted by mcpapa View Post
    We didn't exactly have the most palatable of major-party candidates last time around, did we?
    You know how in most situations we can say "It could have been worse?" I don't think that would have been true in November.

  12. #27
    FarBeyondDriven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 06
    Location
    Slide a piece o' da' porter. Drink side, run da' java. Hey lookie here. I can dig grease 'n chompin' on some butter and draggin' through the garden.
    Posts
    4,721

    Quote Originally Posted by mcpapa View Post
    We didn't exactly have the most palatable of major-party candidates last time around, did we?
    Have we ever? In today's social media soaked culture, nothing is secret.....or sacred. We now have almost unlimited access to candidates past and present.

  13. #28

    Join Date
    Mar 15
    Posts
    1,935

    Did the Russians prevent Hillary from campaigning in Wisconsin?

  14. #29
    Hellcats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14
    Posts
    5,203

    Quote Originally Posted by mountain ref View Post
    Nothing from Wikileaks made me not vote for Hillary.

    Her rude behavior, snobby nose, her crooked Clinton Foundation, better than thou attitude, and her rich arrogance and hollier than holy attitude.
    That's why no one voted for her.
    Not the Russians.
    Ref, I believe your vote for Trump was locked in and it is fair to say NO Russian resources were expended on you.

    But there were people in the fence, and information like Wikileaks did sway them.

  15. #30

    Join Date
    Mar 15
    Posts
    1,935

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    So you agree it happened?

    Penetrating the lax security of the DNC servers does not constitute interfering with an election.

Top