That 2nd Amendment bill that passed cloture vote - no one has read the bill

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 07
    Location
    Bluegrass Region
    Posts
    9,427

    That 2nd Amendment bill that passed cloture vote - no one has read the bill

    The PJ Tatler Gun Bill Passes Senate Cloture, Despite the Fact that No Senator Has Actually Seen It

    Sound familiar?
    Advertisement

  2. #2
    Jumper_Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 06
    Location
    To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible
    Posts
    36,383

    They had to pass it to see what was in it...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 01
    Location
    City of Beautiful Homes
    Posts
    24,589

    Deja vu all over again?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 13
    Posts
    8,216

    This bill won't get out of the House. Complete waste of time.

  5. #5
    Content1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 13
    Location
    Me and my horsey and a quart o' beer
    Posts
    4,650

    They should be focusing on mental health and parenting. But that would make way too much sense!

  6. #6
    jvdfc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 06
    Location
    By the Lake
    Posts
    8,311

    Quote Originally Posted by Content1 View Post
    They should be focusing on mental health and parenting. But that would make way too much sense!
    This

  7. #7
    Run To State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 03
    Location
    I've got a strong urge to fly. But I got nowhere to fly to."
    Posts
    27,658

    Quote Originally Posted by Content1 View Post
    They should be focusing on mental health and parenting. But that would make way too much sense!
    I agree, they should. Unfortunately, all that matters to them is their agenda to grab guns.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 00
    Location
    Louisville, Ky USA
    Posts
    4,317

    They voted to allow discussion of the bill. What is there about discussing the bill that scares people? Could it be that they are afraid that there is absolutely NOTHING in the bill that would allow the government to "grab guns"? I ask the fear mongers on this board to please show us what in the Manchin - Toomey bill allows the government to "grab guns".

  9. #9
    Run To State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 03
    Location
    I've got a strong urge to fly. But I got nowhere to fly to."
    Posts
    27,658

    The way I understand it, the proposal will allow a doctor to add a patient to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System without ever telling the patient he or she has been added. No due process requirement. What if there is a mistake and your doctor flags you as having mental illness without your knowledge? You may very well see the state come collect your previously purchased guns in some states. That's one reason for some to fear it.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 10
    Posts
    2,129

    The Obama Administration is strong arming D's and R's behind the scenes. One lawmaker has even suggested some are being blackmailed.

    Color me not shocked.

  11. #11
    Habib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 06
    Location
    Buy the ticket, take the ride
    Posts
    11,673

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jul 01
    Location
    Beautiful Lake Cumberland
    Posts
    4,996

    Quote Originally Posted by Trinity alum View Post
    They voted to allow discussion of the bill. What is there about discussing the bill that scares people? Could it be that they are afraid that there is absolutely NOTHING in the bill that would allow the government to "grab guns"? I ask the fear mongers on this board to please show us what in the Manchin - Toomey bill allows the government to "grab guns".
    The fact that our 2nd amendment rights are even being debated at all is in a word, ridiculous. The only reason folks have any rights is because of guns. Our leaders are sworn to protect these rights. Not try to take them away.

  13. #13
    Run To State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 03
    Location
    I've got a strong urge to fly. But I got nowhere to fly to."
    Posts
    27,658

    BUFFALO, N.Y. — Thursday, a state Supreme Court Judge ruled guns seized from David Lewis, 35, must be returned to him after he was incorrectly identified as violating the mental health provision of the SAFE Act.

    “We know that from the health care agency to the State Police, there was some kind of breach,” said Lewis’ attorney, Jim Tresmond.


    Why were they taken?

    Tresmond says his client was ordered to turn in his weapons last week because he was once on anti-anxiety medication, which is a violation of the SAFE Act. Wednesday, State Police informed the Erie County Clerk’s Office that it made a mistake when it said Lewis was in violation of the state’s new gun law.

    Link

    As I said, you may very well see the state come collect your previously purchased guns in some states and that's why some fear it. And, here is another part of the problem.

    The NY SAFE Act requires “mental health professionals, in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment, to report if an individual they are treating is likely to engage in conduct that will cause serious harm to him- or herself or others.”

    If such a determination is made, “the Division of Criminal Justice Services will determine whether the person possesses a firearms license and, if so, will notify the appropriate local licensing official, who must suspend the license. The person’s firearms will then be removed.”

    The law has come under fire from gun-rights advocates as well as mental health professionals, who fear the new law discourages people from seeking professional help for mental health issues.


    Could Prescription Meds Result in Gun Confiscation?

  14. #14
    jvdfc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 06
    Location
    By the Lake
    Posts
    8,311

    Quote Originally Posted by Trinity alum View Post
    They voted to allow discussion of the bill. What is there about discussing the bill that scares people? Could it be that they are afraid that there is absolutely NOTHING in the bill that would allow the government to "grab guns"? I ask the fear mongers on this board to please show us what in the Manchin - Toomey bill allows the government to "grab guns".
    See post #13.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Apr 07
    Location
    Bluegrass Region
    Posts
    9,427

    The ATF Wants 'Massive' Online Database to Find Out Who Your Friends Are | Danger Room | Wired.com

    "The ATF doesn’t just want a huge database to reveal everything about you with a few keywords. It wants one that can find out who you know. And it won’t even try to friend you on Facebook first."

    "Many other specific requirements are also to be expected for a federal law enforcement agency: searching names, phone numbers, “nationwide utility data” and reverse phone searches. The data will then be collected to help out during investigations and provide “relevant information and intelligence products.” There’s no hint the database is to be used to track gun sales, which is a big part of the ATF’s job, as the bureau is prohibited by law from establishing a centralized electronic database for gun purchases."

Top