Results 81 to 100 of 163
- Jan 24, 13, 01:20 PM #81Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 06
- Location
- "Bow down to the kingdom of the madness!! OOOOOH, YEAH!!!!"
- Posts
- 28,686
When you look at the fact that a person can go to jail for 3-5 years for carrying a few crack rocks on them but get probation for carry the same amount of powder that would produce 3-5 rocks there is a problem. Add in the fact that the crack rock form of cocaine is/was prevalent in the inner city and that powder users tend to be in the suburbs..well....then....there you have it.
- Jan 24, 13, 01:21 PM #82
- Jan 24, 13, 01:23 PM #83All District
- Join Date
- Oct 11
- Posts
- 498
- Jan 24, 13, 01:32 PM #84
But as an individual, I would think you would want to safeguard your most basic natural rights that are not given to you by government. Therefore you do your fighting at the ballot box, volunteer for candidates that is protecting those rights, like Rand Paul (he would end the drug war and realizes the racist background.) or donate money to a group that is dedicated to overturning the unjust laws. I have a few on the top of my head.
- Jan 24, 13, 01:33 PM #85Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 06
- Location
- "Bow down to the kingdom of the madness!! OOOOOH, YEAH!!!!"
- Posts
- 28,686
While I agree somewhat there has always been a feeling that these laws do have a racial agenda and the government's inability to reform these laws hasn't done anything to relieve that belief. A non-violent two time drug offender shouldn't be sitting in prison for 15 years.
- Jan 24, 13, 01:33 PM #86
- Jan 24, 13, 01:34 PM #87All BluegrassPreps.com
- Join Date
- Nov 03
- Location
- “I've got a strong urge to fly. But I got nowhere to fly to."
- Posts
- 22,502
What business is it of yours why he has those guns? You have a problem with collectors?
So...because "it won't happen in Danville" it won't happen any place else?
Simply put, you don't sound all that supportive of the 2nd and you, rockmom or any of the others in opposition haven't told me how criminals are going to be limited. The problem with EVERYTHING being proposed is it's ONLY going to affect the law abiding. How do these so called solutions keep schools or my home safe?
- Jan 24, 13, 01:39 PM #88
'Enough is enough,' Feinstein says in proposing new gun ban - CNN.com
However, those grandfathered weapons will be put in a national registry.Feinstein's measure would stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacture of more than 100 specialty firearms and certain semi-automatic rifles, as well as limiting magazines to 10 rounds or less, she said. Not all of the weapons in the bill meet the technical definition of assault weapons.
The restrictions would not apply to guns owned before enactment of any law. Feinstein noted her proposal exempts from the ban more than 2,000 models used for hunting or sporting purposes.
"They are by make and model exempted from the legislation," she said, adding that the old ban had 375 such exemptions.
- Jan 24, 13, 01:40 PM #89All District
- Join Date
- Oct 11
- Posts
- 498
- Jan 24, 13, 01:41 PM #90All District
- Join Date
- Oct 11
- Posts
- 498
- Jan 24, 13, 01:49 PM #91
And it is a poor excuse to throw someone in jail for years. You wonder why they black community is doing so poor in areas? Laws like this. Government intervention has destroyed the black family. Black males are often the target and are the ones in jail. What is that sterotype about black kids and fathers? Why is that? Study: Whites More Likely to Abuse Drugs Than Blacks | TIME.com
You are correct, its an individual choice, its their body, and that the individual must take responsiblity for. If it doesn't infringe on another perosn's life, liberty or property, the law has no justification. Simple as that.
- Jan 24, 13, 01:49 PM #92
- Jan 24, 13, 01:51 PM #93
Not only drug laws, but gun control as well. You cannot defend this. It is the same thing as making sure black people in urban areas cannot defend themselves, much like the government made sure free slaves couldn't protect themselves agaisnt the KKK.
Who Goes to Prison Due to Gun Control? | The Beacon
Perhaps the most telling data concerns the racial makeup of who goes to prison for gun violations. According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, for Fiscal Year 2011, 49.6% of those sentenced to federal incarceration with a primary offense of firearms violations were black, 20.6% were Hispanic, and only 27.5% were white.
This is how gun laws actually work—those caught violating them go to prison. For the mere act of owning an illegal weapon—not necessarily for using it, not for threatening anyone with it, not for being irresponsible with it—people who have harmed no one are locked up in prison for years at a time. As with the rest of the criminal justice system, particularly the war on drugs, these laws disproportionately harm the poor and minorities. That is the inescapable reality of gun control.
- Jan 24, 13, 01:51 PM #94
- Jan 24, 13, 01:57 PM #95Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 06
- Location
- "Bow down to the kingdom of the madness!! OOOOOH, YEAH!!!!"
- Posts
- 28,686
If he wants to show off his guns that's on him. I didn't ask to see them. I don't care that he has them. He said let me show you my guns. Forgive me for questioning why anyone would need that big of a gun. I question EVERYTHING in life and always will. Just the way it is.
Criminals will never be limited. If the 2nd Amendment stated it was in place to protect you from criminals then I'd understand. That's not in the literature.
The problem isn't the guns it's the people with the guns. I don't trust people I don't know with guns. Criminals or law abiding. I really don't care if I don't sound supportive of the 2nd Amendment. If nothing changes then I'm cool with that. If restrictions are put in place I am cool with that too. If that is me not supporting the 2nd Amendment then so be it.
Wasn't there an Amendment saying blacks were 3/5 of a person? Why is that one okay to change when the times dictate it but it's not okay to change others when the times may dictate it? I'm still having a hard time believing interpretation of the law in 1776 means the same in 2013.
- Jan 24, 13, 02:01 PM #96Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 06
- Location
- "Bow down to the kingdom of the madness!! OOOOOH, YEAH!!!!"
- Posts
- 28,686
I love the fact that I understand why gun control is being pushed through means I am for gun control. Uh...no. I get why they are doing it. I don't agree with some of the things they want to push through. I will comply with the law.
- Jan 24, 13, 02:04 PM #97
- Jan 24, 13, 02:05 PM #98
- Jan 24, 13, 02:14 PM #99
The difference is the change regarding 3/5ths is its omitting a part of the man-made (government) law and restoring natural law. This is an example of unjust law and insinuates government grants us our rights, rather than we are born with them. This is more freedom. When you are saying restrict firearms, you are restricting freedom.
- Jan 24, 13, 02:25 PM #100Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 06
- Location
- "Bow down to the kingdom of the madness!! OOOOOH, YEAH!!!!"
- Posts
- 28,686
I hear you. I guess for me the whole gun control thing comes off to me as the government being fed up with mass shootings and having no logical or true solution to stop it and knee-jerking their reaction and going after guns. I don't feel like 'restricting freedom' is their intent even though in essence that is what they are doing. And I think they are going about it the wrong way as well. I'd rather see them properly research all guns so law abiding citizens aren't the victims but I will still question why anyone needs an AK-47 or any big gun. Collector or not. I know a guy who is a collector and he very very rarely shoots any of his guns.
I do have a ton of friends and family like Spin so when Red Dawn comes I'll be good and my wife will have her gun soon so when the 3 ninjas attack we'll be safe.

51Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Would LeBron go back to the Cavs?
Yesterday, 09:11 PM in National Basketball Association (NBA)