FBI Ready to Indict Hillary

Page 8 of If Obama determines that Uncle Joe gives him the best chance to be followed by a Dem, Hillary will be indicted. If he doesn't, she won't. Sanders is a ... 170 comments | 5939 Views | Go to page 1 →

  1. #106

    Join Date
    Feb 11
    Location
    mnts
    Posts
    13,807

    I can't remember how to google, I fainted and hit my head and suffered a concussion, I might be able to remember how to in about 6 months
    That's my excuse
    Advertisement

  2. #107

    Join Date
    Feb 11
    Location
    mnts
    Posts
    13,807

    Quote Originally Posted by lawildcat View Post
    At the end of the day, BO will just pardon her.
    Unless he has his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood or CAIR make her disappear

  3. #108
    Hellcats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14
    Posts
    5,772

    Quote Originally Posted by mountain ref View Post
    Unless he has his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood or CAIR make her disappear
    Looks like your Google machine still works.

  4. #109

    Join Date
    Feb 11
    Location
    mnts
    Posts
    13,807

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    Looks like your Google machine still works.
    No need to google what is common sense or common knowledge

  5. #110
    MayfieldFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 14
    Posts
    1,105

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    Looks like your Google machine still works.
    His proctologist fixed it

  6. #111

    Join Date
    Apr 07
    Location
    Bluegrass Region
    Posts
    10,688

    Quote Originally Posted by lawildcat View Post
    At the end of the day, BO will just pardon her.
    Quote Originally Posted by mountain ref View Post
    Unless he has his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood or CAIR make her disappear
    I think the la is correct. Not because they are allies but because they seem to have a Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) and certainly a mutual dislike of each other.

    As far who makes her and Bill dissapear if she is not in the WH next January - its hard to say. They owe many who were counting on HR being Prez. Those mega-donations from foreigners and domestics to the Clinton Foundation where not to help the children of the world.

  7. #112

    Join Date
    Apr 07
    Location
    Bluegrass Region
    Posts
    10,688

    While I believe in due process for criminal chages its clear that HR broke the law. The basic facts are direct conflict with so many specific laws and regulations. Indictment, trial, and beyond a reasonable doubt are all used for criminal procedings and may end up in play here.

    But one should not need to wait for due process to know if someone is so corrupt, so incapable to telling the truth, and has almost a life-long track record of lying in official proceedings that they are completely disqualified for an office.

  8. #113
    Jesse James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 02
    Posts
    10,228

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcats View Post
    It's not given she has broken the law. That may be proven in court or it may not due to not enough evidence. That has little to do with party lines and more to do with the justice system.




    Get on your Google machine and you'll find it.
    So you dont think she broke the law? Now it turns out that Obama himself emailed her on this email address several times. Do you not think he knew this was not .gov address? So we now have him complicit?

  9. #114
    Hellcats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14
    Posts
    5,772

    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse James View Post
    So you dont think she broke the law? Now it turns out that Obama himself emailed her on this email address several times. Do you not think he knew this was not .gov address? So we now have him complicit?
    I'll believe she broke the law when she is found guilty. It seems you can read 10 articles on the Internet and 5 say she did and 5 say she didn't. The area seems extremely gray.

    I said this earlier. How would those above her not know she was using this server and email?

  10. #115

    Join Date
    Feb 13
    Posts
    3,546

    in other breaking campaign news : Bernie Sanders is leading Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire… setting the stage for an epic battle between the aging socialist and Bernie Sanders." - See more at: NewsBusted: They Might As Well Be Twins, Ya Know

  11. #116

    Join Date
    Jul 01
    Location
    Beautiful Lake Cumberland
    Posts
    5,235

  12. #117
    Jumper_Dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 06
    Location
    To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible
    Posts
    50,113

    Mrs. Clinton has said repeatedly that she never sent or received emails "Marked Classified" at the time the were sent or received. She keeps saying that every time she is asked about this and he campaign repeats it in nearly every response.

    Maybe they weren't marked "Classified or Top Secret" at the time...does that mean she's clear and has no worries?

    Lets consider this for a minute...If I know classified or secret information and I email that information to others on a non secure network...did I break the law...even though I didn't tag the email as classified or top secret? That in and of itself is telling that she was sending emails and didn't realize she was sending material that should have been listed as "Classified" or higher. By circumventing the correct process her emails weren't vetted correctly and no one had a chance to see if they should have been Classified before she sent them.

    Part of the reason, outside of basic security, for using the official servers of the State Department is so that emails can be vetted and tagged as Classified or Top Secret in needed.

    The reason these Emails are NOW tagged as "Classified" or "Top Secret" is because the state department didn't see them to vet them until they were recovered from her server. I'd be willing to bet that many of those emails should have and would have been listed as "Classified" or "Top Secret" had they went through the proper channels instead of through her closet server.

    Lastly if China and other countries can hack into Google, Microsoft, Boeing and others...I'm pretty sure they were reading her emails in real time.

    Did she willfully put people in danger, no I don't think so.
    Did she through her own hubris show a disregard for the rules that may have endangered others, absolutely.



    I still think this goes badly for her, and Uncle Joe will be happy to step in to save the party.

  13. #118

    Join Date
    Aug 12
    Posts
    5,816

    I heard people talking about this today. Even if she somehow escapes criminal prosecution, how does she maintain her security clearance? Can you have a president who does not have top level security clearance? I had not thought of that...

  14. #119
    JDEaston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 13
    Posts
    8,751

    Quote Originally Posted by ggclfan View Post
    I heard people talking about this today. Even if she somehow escapes criminal prosecution, how does she maintain her security clearance? Can you have a president who does not have top level security clearance? I had not thought of that...

    No idea on that. What I don't understand is that you can have someone run for President (and potentially win before the investigation is finished) that is currently being investigated by the FBI. Seems like idiocracy, but what do I know.

  15. #120
    Hellcats's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 14
    Posts
    5,772

    Quote Originally Posted by JDEaston View Post
    No idea on that. What I don't understand is that you can have someone run for President (and potentially win before the investigation is finished) that is currently being investigated by the FBI. Seems like idiocracy, but what do I know.
    Trump says we have a Canadian running, so I guess all bets are off this year.

    Constitution doesn't say anything about being investigated by the FBI. Again innocent until proven guilty, and the court of public opinion doesn't count.

Top