When you summarize the effects of the vote on Proposals 3, 9, and 20, you find that the public schools have discriminated against their neighbors and fellow Kentuckians but protected students from other countries.
By defeating Proposition 9, the publics have shown support for full participation in all state playoffs by foreign exchange students.
However, by passing Proposal 20, this same group has forbidden many of its fellow citizens (and school tax payers) from such participation merely because they have the audacity to attend a private school.
Further, the publics, through the passing of Proposal 3, completely remove any and all of the residents of our neighboring states from any athletic participation in Kentucky.
All in all, I guess we can conclude that, according to the publics, nonresident, nontaxpaying, noncontributing foreign students have more rights than do our neighbors and even our own citizens. Does this seem discriminatory to anyone else?